As we all know that Intel
hasn't given us a new chip every 12 months on the dot, but more or less there's
something new every year. Every year we either get a new architecture on an
established process node (tock), or a derivative architecture on a new process
node (tick). The table below summarizes what we've seen since Intel adopted the
strategy:
Intel's Tick-Tock
Cadence
|
|||
Microarchitecture
|
Process Node
|
Tick or Tock
|
Release Year
|
Conroe/Merom
|
65nm
|
Tock
|
2006
|
Penryn
|
45nm
|
Tick
|
2007
|
Nehalem
|
45nm
|
Tock
|
2008
|
Westmere
|
32nm
|
Tick
|
2010
|
Sandy Bridge
|
32nm
|
Tock
|
2011
|
Ivy Bridge
|
22nm
|
Tick
|
2012
|
Haswell
|
22nm
|
Tock
|
2013
|
I don't understand the logic of selling a high end CPU with the best IGP. Seems like anyone running an it isn't going to stick with the IGP for games, and if they aren't gaming, then what good is that high-end GPU? Maybe the entire "Core i" line should use the HD 4000.
ReplyDeleteIGP performance is nice, but no comments about the subjective quality, i have seen side to side HD Graphics 2000 vs Radeon IGP and the graphics quality was night and day, with the radeon being the day...
ReplyDeleteI dont know whats needed to do properly integrated graphics, but seems intel still lacks...